Filed under: Alzheimer's, Feedback, General Musings, Press, Promotion, Writing stuff
I’m tired.
This stems in large part from the fact that the person for whom I am a care-giver (see this post) has a bit of a cold/flu bug, and so needs more care and attention. As a result, I didn’t get a lot of sleep last night, and I’m guessing that tonight won’t be a lot better.
So I don’t have a lot of energy. Not for blogging, not for writing, not for doing conservation work. Which creates a certain symmetry with the fact that right now I am largely just waiting for things to happen: waiting to hear back from any of the current crop of agents I’ve contacted, waiting to hear about that article in the newspaper, waiting to get feedback from anyone who is reading/has read the novel. Hits to the site have slowed to just a hundred or so a day, and downloads of the full novel are slowly climbing towards 1900. Everything is on hold, waiting, waiting…
Jim Downey
Well, OK, probably not. And, frankly, I’ve had more than my 15 minutes of fame, thanks to my Paint the Moon project and whatnot over the years.
But I am going to be included in a feature that the St. Louis Post-Dispatch is doing about artists, writers, and musicians who are using the web in some innovative ways to get their work out to the public. Over the last couple of days the reporter doing the piece and I have chatted by phone and email. Currently, downloads of the novel are over 1700, and I’ve had almost 9,000 page hits since I put the Communion site up on 5 January. This article will certainly help to boost both of those numbers, and perhaps penetrate into the press in other ways. I’ll post a link here when it is done.
Of course, as I remind friends and well-wishers, the goal still remains to land an agent who can get me a conventional book contract. And that hasn’t happened yet.
Jim Downey
Well, the ‘Web Stats’ feature on my hosting account was glitched for the last few days, but they’ve got it working again. Communion has now seen about 1400 downloads. That’s about 400 in the last week.
I said it before, and I’ll reiterate: wow.
3/8 Update: Just checked this morning – added 200 more overnight!
Jim Downey
More feedback from a reader. Sent this comment (spoiler alert):
I had some serious problems with the Ling character. In a society where children are so rare and cherished, the idea that she might be just wandering the streets was a difficult one. That the scientist Gish might just meet her one day and propose she go on an important scientific mission the next … well, it just seemed too abrupt.
To which I replied:
As to some of your questions about character motivation and behaviour (particularly as pertains to Gish & Ling) – good. Those are supposed to make you wonder. It’s starting to build the mystery. People, and things, are not necessarily what they first seem. This is a parallel construction to the initial reports of the artifact, and designed to get the reader wondering. The trick is, of course, in getting the reader to wonder about the nature of reality, of what is really going on, but not about my competency as a story-teller…
Yeah, that’s the trick. And it is also the trick with getting an agent and a publisher. Because when a book is published, and gets recommendations, the reader will naturally assume that any such ‘problems’ are intentional on the part of the author, and plow on. But before then, in the stage where I am now, people don’t have that kind of trust in me. A first-reader at a big agency or a publishing house is going to hit that stuff and say “gah – this idiot can’t even get past these problems. Pass.”
Part of me wants to grab people by the shirt collar and shake them, saying “look, just read the whole damned thing, OK, then come back and tell me what works or doesn’t work.” But that’s not how the game is played. Instead, most agents and publishers want three chapters to look at, and judge you on that basis. To be honest, it’s a big part of my motivation for putting the entire book online in the way I have – so that there’s a greater chance that someone who is potentially interested in my book may sample more than just the first three chapters, and realize that there is perhaps more to what I am doing than is evident in the first couple of chapters.
Jim Downey
Several things today. First, I got an email from someone who enjoys my blogging on UTI, and sent along this nice comment:
After you mentioned your novel on UTI a couple of days ago, I went to the linked site thinking, “oh great, I like Jim’s writing on the blog, but a novelist?” It’s wonderful! I’m reading a chapter a night before I go to bed, and I’m having a very good time in your world(s). I could always read more each night, but make myself wait as I’m so busy these days that if I gave up sleep, I could finish everything I have to do in the next three months in about three and half months.
Just wanted to tell you that it’s fine work Jim.
I’ll leave it anonymous for now, though I did invite him to come by and post his thoughts for himself. Or I’ll ID him if he gives permission.
Over the last several days, I’ve been trying to identify and contact likely agents to represent me and Communion. As I mentioned previously, I identified over 60 agents who say they handle Science Fiction, so it is slow going to check out each agency online, see what others have to say about them, decide who looks promising, who to contact and who to pass. So far, I have sent queries to seven agents/agencies, and have already heard back from one. That’s the ‘rejection’ part of the title.
But it was quick, painless, professional – all you can expect in this business, and it left me with no ill feelings whatsoever. Having operated an art gallery for 8 years, I know full well what it is like to be on both sides of this equation, and respect anyone who handles giving out a rejection with a modicum of class.
Oh, hits to the Communion site are running between 350-450 a day right now, with something like 150 or so people deciding to download the novel. Over 1100 downloads, last snapshot of the stats I saw.
Jim Downey
Well, I finally found the time and energy to dive back into the Guide to Literary Agents, and to start contacting some of the prospective agencies I’d identified previously, after doing some additional research on them.
And some additional research on me. Because as I put together my query letter (each one tailored to a given agency, based on a general text), I decided to go dig further into the stats for the Communion website to bolster my case for why someone might want to publish my book. I’m not that techno-savvy, and had not previously figured out how to configure my hosting account to get all the information possible. Oh, I knew I had been running (on average) about a thousand hits a week to the site for the past six weeks, but I didn’t know how many people had decided to download the .pdf files of the novel.
It’s over 800. Make that just under 1,000 twenty-four hours later. Wow.
Jim Downey
OK, that was weird. For some reason hits to this blog yesterday were 3x the previous high day, and about 20x the recent daily average.
I don’t have any idea why. The stats on the Communion site were fairly normal. It’s like all of a sudden a bunch of people who had been checking out the book decided to come for a visit here.
Weird.
Jim Downey
I thought that I would outline some policies on comments.
First off, I would encourage commentary, either as feedback on the novel itself, or on any of the other posts I make here. As a general rule, so long as I am able, I will respond to any comment made in good faith. To date that hasn’t been a problem, given how few people have been by and the 1% or so who have made comments, but it is certainly possible if things pick up.
Next, I’m going to be an autocratic bastard. Trolls will not be tolerated. Oh, comments and criticism are welcome, if they seem to be in good faith. But any spam or hatred will be nuked. This is my blog – if you want to hate on me or someone else, get your own blog and do it there. It’s not like they cost anything.
Jim Downey
No, not a Holy Grail reference.
For over 8 years I owned an art gallery. I think it was the largest gallery in the state of Missouri, and featured works by a lot of local and regional artists of remarkable talent. At any given time we represented a couple dozen different artists, in a wide variety of styles, and had 200 or more works of art on hand for people to see (and theoretically buy, which they didn’t do enough of, which is why I closed the business three years ago).
That 8 years of selling art taught me a lot of things. Among those things was that everyone has a different sense of taste in what they like in artwork. And that that is OK.
The same is true of writing, of course. I don’t much appreciate poetry, as a general rule, though I know that a lot of really good poetry is out there, that it has a level of sophistication and intelligence about it which appeals to many people. I don’t much go in for mysteries (with a few exceptions), am ignorant of the entire ‘chick-lit’ genre, and wouldn’t touch most techno-thriller stuff unless I was being paid well to review it. And anyone who knows me well will tell you that I am a nut forthe Harry Potter books – I honestly consider JK Rowling to be a top-notch writer. (Yes, yes, I realize that many people consider them unworthy kid’s books, and Rowling nothing but a hack. We can argue about that later.)
Even within a genre, there are writers I like, and others less so. That doesn’t make those writers bad (though some of them are, and that is the reason I don’t care for them). It just means that for some reason or another their work doesn’t resonate with me.
Which brings me around to my point. It’s OK if you don’t like my novel. No, seriously, if it doesn’t do anything for you, that’s fine. It could be that you don’t care for Science Fiction. Or maybe you just don’t like my writing. Sure, I want people to like it (or at least respect it for being well-done), but I long ago learned that tastes differ widely – what I like in art or literature may be completely at odds with what you like. And that’s OK. To argue otherwise is to basically come down to saying “you can’t like blue. Red is the superior color.”
Anyway, don’t be afraid to say you didn’t like the book. I’m a big boy, have survived learning that not everything I do is going to please everyone.
Jim Downey
In this thread on Daily Kos, someone who had read the first few chapters of the novel had some criticism to offer (go down a bit from where that discussion starts). He said that the first few chapters are too information-dense, and that the reader really doesn’t need to know how everything works.
Now, the issue about presentation – how the information is conveyed – is a legitimate one to criticize. He’s the first person to specifically mention this, but over-loading the reader with too much technical exposition is a real danger when writing science fiction, and I do worry whether I pulled it off as smoothly as I could. You have to keep the reader reading, not getting bogged down in explanations of how and why things are the way they are – but you also have to establish the set and setting of the novel’s reality. It is a tough line to walk, and I’m sure that there will be others who don’t feel that I succeeded.
However, the point the critic made about the information being superflous is dead wrong. As I say on the homepage for the novel, this is classic science fiction, in that a scientific breakthrough leads to a new way (literally in my case) of seeing the universe and what it means to be “human”. I don’t wish to reveal any spoilers here, but suffice it to say that the information I provide in the first three chapters is the key to the entire story arc, and only with that information in hand can the whole book be understood. There is nothing gratuitous about any of it. In fact, I worked very hard to make sure that all the necessary components were in place appropriately, so that no one would think I pulled a deus ex machina at the end.
I think that this points up both a general observation about fiction, and a specific issue about reading a book in this medium. The specific point is easy to deal with first: without a book jacket, and the ‘approval’ conveyed by being conventionally published, a reader will approach an e-book by an unknown author with certain assumptions (that the book isn’t *really* finished, that the writer needs improvement, et cetera). ‘Nuff said.
The general issue is that we live in an era of instant gratification. If the book is too hard, if it demands too much work from the reader without immediate satisfaction, then it will be set aside. Whatever your opinion of this is, it is a fact. Many publishers only want to see the first three chapters of a book for this very reason – on the idea that if you haven’t convinced the reader to keep going at that point, the book will not sell. As a matter of fact, it’s even worse than that: most books on writing stress the importance of the first page of text – how if you don’t get the reader in that short moment of disbelief, you’ve lost.
I like to think that I’ve done a reasonably good job with these issues, but I know some readers will not have the faith necessary to get into the book far enough to make a final determination. We’ll see.
Jim Downey
Communion Of Dreams 